Purakau
He Mahi Rangahau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v3i2.94Palavras-chave:
Artista /acadêmico, Pesquisa conduzida pela prática artística, Kaupapa Māori, PūrākauResumo
A pesquisa conduzida pela prática artística está desafiando a hegemonia acadêmica convencional ao fornecer um espaço onde o conhecimento indígena pode ser valorizado e respeitado. A prática artística no pensamento Māori2 é mais do que a produção de artefatos. É uma forma sagrada e altamente estimada de conhecimento Māori evidenciado pelos tohungas que são reconhecidos como especialistas em seus campos. O processo criativo é profundamente respeitado por suas conotações sagradas (tapu)3 . Tanto seus trabalhos quanto seu associado legado pedagógico (contido na escultura, música, arquitetura, tecelagem ou oratória) são entendidos como inter-relacionados. Valorizados como pensadores, professores e repositórios de conhecimento, o trabalho dos praticantes tohunga alcança gerações. Assim, a pesquisa conduzida pela prática artística, vista pela lente Kaupapa Māori4 , invoca novas formas de pensar e fazer.
Downloads
Referências
Barbara Bolt. “The magic is in the handling” Edited by E. Barrett and B. Bolt. Practice as Research. (London and New York: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, 2007), 27-34.
Clark Moustakas. Heuristics research: Design, Methodology and Applications. (London, Sage, 1990).
Edward Shortland. Māori Religion and Mythology. (London: Longmans, Green & Co. 1882).
Edward Tregear. The Māori Race. (Wanganui: Archibald Dudingston Willis Publisher. 1904).
Glenis Mark. “Rongoā Māori (traditional Māori healing) through the eyes of Māori healers: Sharing the healing while keeping the tapu.” (doctoral thesis, Massey University, 2012).
Hinematau McNeill,“Māori and the natural environment from an occupational justice perspective.” (Journal of Occupational Science, 2017), 24 (1), 19-28.
Hirini Mead. “Tikanga Māori Living by Māori Values.” (Wellington: Huia Publishers. 2003).
Jennifer George. “Creativity in organizations.” (Academy of Management Annals, 2007), 1, 439-467.
Jillian Hamilton & Luke Jaaniste. “Content, structure and orientations of the practice-led exegesis.” (Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 2010), 3(1), 31-44.
Linda Candy. Practice based research: A guide. Sydney: University of Technology Creativity & Cognition Studios. CCS Report. 2006, 1, 1-19. Accessed April 25, 2018. http://www.creativityandcognition.com
Malcom Voyce, (1989). “Māori Health in NZ: The Tohunga Suppression Act 1907.” (Oceania 2, 1989), 109-110.
Martha Beckwith. Hawaiian Mythology. Honolulu. University of Hawaii Press. 1970.
Mason Durie. Ngā Kāhui Pou Launching Māori Futures. (Wellington: Huia Publishers. 2003).
Nigel Cross. “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science.” Design Issues, 2001, 17(3), 49-55.
Paul Moon. Tohunga: Hohepa Kereopa. (Auckland: David Ling. 2003).
Ranginui Walker. (2005). “Growing research skills at iwi level.” Tihei Oriori Monograph Series. (Auckland: Nga Pae o Te Māramatanga, University of Auckland 2005).
Robert Jahnke. “Tohunga Whakairo: Paki Harrison.” Journal of the Polynesian Society, 2009), 118 (4), 392-394.
Roger Maaka. Why the Tohunga Suppression Act 1907? Edited by A. Talu and M. Quanchi Messy Entanglements. (Papers of the 10th Pacific History Association Conference 1995).
Te Kapunga Matemoana Dewes. “The Case for Oral Arts.” Edited by M. King. Te Ao Hurihuri: The World Moves On. (New Zealand: Hicks Smith & Sons. 1975).
Tohunga Suppression Act 1907. (7 EDW VII 1907 No 13).
Welby Ings. “Managing Heuristics as a Method of Inquiry in Autobiographical Graphic Design Theses.” International Journal of Art & Design Education, 2011), 30, 226-241.
William Westervelt. Legends of Maui. (Honolulu: Hawaiian Gazette, 1910).
