A recalibração do currículo de um estúdio de design durante o COVID–19 em Aotearoa

Autores

  • Meighan Ellis
  • Fiona Grieve

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v6i2.410

Palavras-chave:

COVID–19, Design de currículo, Educação em design, Aprendizado online, Prática de estúdio

Resumo

Este artigo apresenta o impacto que Covid-19 teve na revitalização de um currículo de design de comunicação no primeiro ano com o objetivo de progredir os alunos de um critério baseado em padrões de nível secundário para uma cultura terciária baseada em estudos de estúdio baseados na prática ativa e experiencial. Metodologicamente, ele descreve uma intervenção de pesquisa baseada em design que pergunta o que aconteceu na tradução de um briefing escrito como um modelo baseado em estúdio em uma empresa puramente online, aprendendo de qualquer lugar, ensinando em um estado de fluxo constante? Por meio de um comentário sobre a prática, a revitalização de um programa de design e a mudança pedagógica de dentro do paradigma do estúdio tradicional - um modelo dinâmico no campus, presencial em um empreendimento online abrupto e atípico devido à pandemia global, este artigo contribui a um discurso sobre a abordagem de um estúdio de design e apresenta a transferência do Sistema de Gestão de Aprendizagem que apóia a educação a distância.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Meighan Ellis

Is a creative hybrid, with a background and professional training in photography, graphic design, moving image, fine-art and design theory and more recently a re-acquaintance with clay. Her multi-disciplinary practice spans various media and is distinctively positioned at the intersection between art and commerce. Meighan’s work has been exhibited in New Zealand, America, Europe, Australia and Japan, and her photographic and ceramic works are held in private collections in New Zealand and overseas. For a number of years she lived in London, Sydney and Tokyo, where, alongside her fine-art practice and a long list of creative and commercial side-hustles, she worked as a writer, photographer, designer, art director, content creator and producer for various international clients, brands, print and online channels.

Fiona Grieve

is Head of Communications Design Department at Auckland University of Technology. She is an Academic Leader and Creative Director with 20+ years’ experience in design education, research and consultancy. She is engaged in projects that utilise collaborative processes to comprehend and distill information into visual systems. Her practice positions publication design as a reflective and reflexive research platform to facilitate educational discourse and examine practice-based research and industry contexts. She has been involved in a number of collaborations which intersect educational and professional domains of practice: THREADED is an international award winning design magazine; and FREE PLAN is the Alla Prima Project which expands on approaches to design and visual arts, assessment, curricula and studio-centred education.

Referências

Anderson, L. W., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. UK: Longman.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 497.

Biggs, John. (2012). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 39-55. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2012.642839

Bolstad, R., & Gilbert., J with McDowall, S Bull., A Boyd., S & Hipkins, R (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning and teaching: A New Zealand perspective. Ministry of Education.

Boyd, D. (2016). What Would Paulo Freire Think of Blackboard™: Critical Pedagogy in an age of Online Learning. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy. Vol. 7 No. 1. p. 174-5.

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.

Collins, A. (1992). Toward a Design Science of Education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New Directions in Educational Technology (pp. 15–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Delors, J., Chung, F., Geremek, B., Gorham, W., Kornhauser, A., Manley, M., & Nanzhao, Z. (1996). Relatório para a UNESCO da Comissão Internacional sobre Educação para o século XXI. Educação um tesouro a descobrir, 6.

Dewey, J. (1937). Education and Social Change. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, (1915-1955), 23(6), 472-474.

Drick Boyd (2016) What Would Paulo Freire Think of Blackboard™: Critical Pedagogy in an age of Online Learning, International Journal of Critical Pedagogy | Vol. 7 No. 1, 2016 (p. 174-5).

Ehn, P., & Ullmark, P. (2017). Educating the Reflective Design Researcher. In L. Vaughan (Eds.). Practice-based Design Research (pp. 77–86). London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: Retrieved April 12, 2021, from DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474267830.ch-008

Ellis, M., & Grieve, F. (2020, December). Teaching in a State of Flux and Uncertainty: Transitioning the Design Studio during COVID-19. In Link Symposium Abstracts 2020 (pp. 20-21). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24135/linksymposium.vi.5

Freire, P. (2007). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th Anniversary Edition. New York: Continuum Press. Gowing, M., & Brandt, E. (2019). Ficciones Typografika. Sydney: Formist.

Kampen, S. (2019). An Investigation into Uncovering and Understanding Tacit Knowledge in a First-Year Design Studio Environment. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12171

Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning [Editorial]. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7

Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2005). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education Vol. 4, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566

Kuhn, G., & Quigley, A. (1997). Understanding and Using Action Research in Practice Settings. Kuhn, G., & Quigley, A. (Eds.), Creating Practical Knowledge through Action Research, (pp. 23-40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lourie, M. (2020). Recontextualising 21st century learning in New Zealand education policy: The reframing of knowledge, skills and competencies. New Zealand Journal of Education Studies, 55, 125.

Maslow, A. H. (1962). Lessons from the Peak-Experiences. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2 (1), 9-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002216786200200102

McPhail, G. (2020). Twenty-First Century Learning and the case for More Knowledge About Knowledge. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00172-2.

Mortensen Steagall, M., Tavares, T. and Barbosa, N. (2020). Communication Design Department Response to COVID-19: A study for online delivery in Blackboard. Unpublished report.

Wang, F & Hannafin, M.J. (2005). Design-Based Research and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23. p. 6).

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Como Citar

Ellis, M., & Grieve, F. (2021). A recalibração do currículo de um estúdio de design durante o COVID–19 em Aotearoa. DAT Journal, 6(2), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v6i2.410

Edição

v. 6 n. 2 (2021): Dossiês Saúde(s) + PPG DTI UNIFATEA + Simpósio LINK

Seção

Dossiê Simpósio LINK