Habilidades, mentalidades e métodos de design de pesquisa e design para práticas revolucionárias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v6i2.408Palavras-chave:
Métodos de pesquisa, usos queer, resultados de pesquisa não tradicionail, métodos de designResumo
Este artigo baseia-se nas identidades complementares de um “designer pesquisador” como uma pessoa que informa sua prática de design com pesquisa e um “pesquisador designer” como uma pessoa que informa sua prática de pesquisa com design. Aqui, eu estendo e examino essa dualidade redutiva, prestando muita atenção às habilidades, mentalidades, métodos e práticas em design e pesquisa. Eu defendo que quando as habilidades, ferramentas, técnicas e métodos normalmente usados na atividade de design são usados na atividade de pesquisa, distinções claras precisam ser articuladas nos propósitos e contextos de seu uso. Indivíduos que estão em posição de executar funções tão diferentes quanto design e pesquisa podem ser considerados “ambidestros” ou “revolucionários”, pois têm o potencial de cultivar sinergias disruptivas entre esses mundos. O artigo aborda a rica diversidade, as oportunidades e riscos, e as tensões éticas que vêm da ‘mudança de chapéus’ entre as práticas estabelecidas de design e pesquisa e os usos ‘queer’ de métodos em tais interstícios. Eu me baseio em trabalhos anteriores sobre a adaptação criativa de métodos de design para pesquisas interdisciplinares (Sosa & Grocott, 2020). O artigo conclui com questões geradoras para aqueles que embarcam nas práticas revolucionárias emergentes entre design e pesquisa.
Downloads
Referências
Agid, S., & Akama, Y. (2020). Reflexive account-giving through ‘practice notations’: plural dimensions and dynamics of infrastructuring. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020-Participation (s) Otherwise-Volume 2, Ahmed, S. (2019). What's the Use?: On the Uses of Use. Duke University Press.
Beck, J., & Stolterman, E. (2016). Examining the types of knowledge claims made in design research. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(3), 199-214.
de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers.
Esparza, A. (2020). Entrepreneurship With Additive Manufacturing: Implications of Complexity Freedom in Product and Firm Ideation AUT University]. Auckland. http://hdl.handle.net/10292/13125
Finke, R. A. (1996, 1996/09/01/). Imagery, Creativity, and Emergent Structure. Consciousness and Cognition, 5(3), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1996.0024
Frayling, C. (1994). Research in art and design (Royal College of Art Research Papers, Issue.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Gold, R. (2007). The plenitude: Creativity, innovation, and making stuff. Mit Press.
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art, an Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Hackett.
Gray, C., & Malins, J. (2016). Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Routledge. Hanington, B. (2003). Methods in the making: A perspective on the state of human research in design. Design Issues, 19(4), 9-18.
Haseman, B. (2007). Rupture and recognition: Identifying the performative research paradigm. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry (pp. 147-157). Tauris, I.B.
Kara, H. (2015). Creative Research Methods in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Policy Press.
Kitcher, P. (2000). A priori knowledge revisited. In P. Boghossian & C. Peacocke (Eds.), New Essays on the A Priori (pp. 65-91). Clarendon Press.
Kocienda, K. (2018). Creative Selection: Inside Apple's design process. Macmillan.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, Ill. : University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Kumar, V. (2013). 101 Design Methods: A Structured Approach for Driving Innovation in your Organization. Wiley.
Laurel, B. (2003). Design research: Methods and perspectives. MIT press.
Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge.
Montiel, M., Sosa Medina, R., & Hocking, D. (2020). Activity Scenario Modelling: an emerging method for examining human-artefact interaction. Synergy - DRS International Conference 2020, Online.
Moradi, P., Hunting, A., & Sosa Medina, R. (2019, 2019/11/21/). A UX Pedagogy on Multimodal Aspects of Emotions. Fifth International Conference for Design Education Researchers, Ankara.
Pei, E., Campbell, I., & Evans, M. (2011). A taxonomic classification of visual design representations used by industrial designers and engineering designers. The Design Journal, 14(1), 64-91.
Senge, P. M., Smith, B., Kruschwitz, N., Laur, J., & Schley, S. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. Currency.
Slocum, N. (2003). Participatory Methods Toolkit: A Practitioner’s Manual. United Nations University.
Sosa, R., & Grocott, L. (2020). The creative translation of design methods into social research contexts. In H. Kara & S. Khoo (Eds.), Researching in the Age of COVID-19 Vol 3: Volume III: Creativity and Ethics (Vol. 3, pp. 9-19). Policy Press.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 3-9.
Stappers, P. J. (2007). Doing design as a part of doing research. In Design research now (pp. 81-91). Springer.
Telenko, C., Sosa, R., & Wood, K. L. (2016). Changing conversations and perceptions: The research and practice of design science. In C. A. & L. U. (Eds.), Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice (pp. 281-309). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19449-3_19
Vaughan, L. (2017). Practice-based Design Research. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Verswijvelen, M., Sosa, R., & Martini, N. (2020, August 2020). Designing game-inspired narratives for learning. Synergy - DRS International Conference 2020, Online.
Walker, S. (2013). Imagination’s promise: Practice-based design research for sustainability. In The handbook of design for sustainability (pp. 446-465). Bloomsbury Academic.
Yee, J. (2017). The researcherly designer/the designerly researcher. In L. Vaughan (Ed.), Practice-based Design Research (pp. 155). Bloomsbury Academic.
Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2008). The role of design artifacts in design theory construction. Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 2(1), 41-45.
