Design para o mundo real: o estúdio como abordagem pedagógica no ensino de criatividade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v6i2.401Palavras-chave:
Educação em disign, Design social, Estúdio de design, Pesquisa orientada pela práticaResumo
Este artigo descreve o papel do estúdio de design como uma abordagem pedagógica e apresenta o desenvolvimento de um brief (nome utilizado para descrever o conteúdo programático de uma disciplina) realizado com alunos do terceiro ano de graduação em Design, em Aotearoa, Nova Zelândia. Uma estrutura mista de métodos quantitativos e qualitativos, foi empregada para o design da disciplina e seu conteúdo curricular. A literatura e as pesquisas com questionamentos centrados no ser humano informaram a construção do conteúdo e modos de interpretar os dados e situar os resultados. Usando Pesquisa baseada em design (Design-based research ou DBR (Collins, 1999; Brown, 1999) e uma metodologia utilizada por educadores para analisar o desenvolvimento do briefing, o artigo apresenta os resultados dos alunos e as atividades cronológicas desenvolvidas em sala de aula ao longo de um período de 12 semanas (correspondente a um semestre acadêmico). Experiências com clientes e usuários permitiram que os alunos compreendessem problemas complexos e interconectados dentro do tema de Design Social. O estudo teve como resultado um ambiente criativo e crítico, com o uso de atividades que promoveram a diversidade cultural e o uso da tecnologia com métodos colaborativos dentro das práticas do estúdio de design.
Downloads
Referências
ARMSTRONG, Leah et al. Social design futures: HEI research and the AHRC. 2014.
BAKKER, Arthur; VAN EERDE, Dolly. An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In: Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education. Springer, Dordrecht, 2015. p. 429-466.
BAYNES, Ken. Models of Change: The future of design education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, v. 15, n. 3, 2010.
BOR, Stephanie E. Teaching social media journalism: Challenges and opportunities for future curriculum design. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, v. 69, n. 3, p. 243-255, 2014.
BROWN, Ann L. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating
complex interventions in classroom settings. The journal of the learning sciences, v. 2, n. 2, p. 141-178, 1992.
BROWN, Chris; TAYLOR, Carol; PONAMBALUM, Lorna. Using design-based research to improve the lesson study approach to professional development in Camden (London). London Review of Education, v. 14, n. 2, p. 4-24, 2016.
CHEN, Dung-Sheng et al. Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-5, 2016.
CHRISTENSEN, Kimberly; WEST, Richard E. The development of design-based research. Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology, 2018.
COLLINS, Allan. Toward a design science of education. In: New directions in educational technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992. p. 15-22.
COSTLEY, Kevin C. The Positive Effects of Technology on Teaching and Student Learning. Online submission, 2014.
EBAEGUIN, Marlon. Parallelisms between lesson study and design-based research. Contemporary Approaches to Research in Mathematics, Science, Health and Environmental Education, v. 1, p. 1-7, 2014.
GETENET, Seyum. Using design-based research to bring partnership between researchers and practitioners. Educational Research, v. 61, n. 4, p. 482-494, 2019.
GRAY, Carole; MALINS, Julian. Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Routledge, 2016.
HAMILTON, Jillian; JAANISTE, Luke. A connective model for the practice-led research exegesis: An analysis of content and structure. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, v. 3, n. 1, p. 31-44, 2010.
PANUKU, Kia Eke. nd Mātauranga Māori: Voices from the Kia Eke Panuku team—Leading the Change.
KURT, Serhat. Technology use in elementary education in Turkey: A case study. New Horizons in Education, v. 58, n. 1, p. 65-76, 2010.
LOH, C. et al. Te Roopu Waiora E Inclusão Na Nova Zelândia. Um Projeto De Design Para Uma Ong Māori Dedicada a Deficientes. In: ARTEFACTO 2020. Centro de Investigação e Comunicação (CIAC), 2020. p. 211-216.
MARGOLIN, Victor. Social design: From utopia to the good society. The Social Design Reader, p. 17, 2019.
MCDONAGH, Deana; DENTON, Howard. Exploring the degree to which individual students share a common perception of specific mood boards: observations relating to teaching, learning and team-based design. Design Studies, v. 26, n. 1, p. 35-53, 2005.
MELLES, Gavin; DE VERE, Ian; MISIC, Vanja. Socially responsible design: thinking beyond the triple bottom line to socially responsive and sustainable product design. CoDesign, v. 7, n. 3-4, p. 143-154, 2011.
MICHIE, K.; MORTENSEN STEAGALL, M. From Shadow: a practice-led design research on academic anxiety. DAT-Design, Art and Technology Journal, v. 6, n. 1, p. 339-354, 2021.
MORAN, Mike; SEAMAN, Jeff; TINTI-KANE, Hester. Teaching, Learning, and Sharing: How Today's Higher Education Faculty Use Social Media. Babson Survey Research Group, 2011.
MORTENSEN STEAGALL, Marcos; INGS, Welby. Pesquisa de doutorado practice-led ea natureza dos métodos imersivos. DAT Journal, v. 3, n. 2, p. 392 423, 2018.
MORTENSEN STEAGALL, M.; TAVARES, T. Design Social: Uma Experiência Educativa Da Nova Zelândia. In: International Conference on Digital Creation in Arts and Communication, ARTeFACTo2020. Centro de Investigação e Comunicação (CIAC), 2020. p. 33-40.
MORTENSEN STEAGALL, Marcos; TAVARES, Tatiana. Diseño como atelier educativo de Aotearoa Nueva Zelanda. 2020.
NASADOWSKI, Becky. Design and Social Impact: A Cross-Sectoral Agenda for Design Education, Research, and Practice by Julie Lasky. 2015.
SANGASUBANA, Nisaratana. How to conduct ethnographic research. Qualitative Report, v. 16, n. 2, p. 567-573, 2011.
SCHON, Donald A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Avebury, 1991.
SOULELES, Nicos. Design for social change and design education: Social challenges versus teacher-centred pedagogies. The Design Journal, v. 20, n. sup1, p. S927-S936, 2017.
TAVARES, Tatiana; INGS, Welby. Transitando pela investigação artística em uma tese de produção criativa. DAT Journal, v. 3, n. 2, p. 9-42, 2018.
TAVARES, Tatiana; STEAGALL, Marcos Mortensen. Inquiry through practice: The brief as a pedagogical method for design research. In: Link Symposium Abstracts 2020. 2020. p. 14-15.
TAVARES, Tatiana; MORTENSEN STEAGALL, M. Auckland Plan 2050: A Narrative Experience of a Social Design Project in Aotearoa New Zealand. In: Design Research Society 2020. Design Research Society Secretariat, 2020. p. 1150-1167.
TROMP, Nynke; HEKKERT, Paul; VERBEEK, Peter-Paul. Design for socially responsible behavior: a classification of influence based on intended user experience. Design issues, v. 27, n. 3, p. 3-19, 2011.
WANG, Feng; HANNAFIN, Michael J. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational technology research and development, v. 53, n. 4, p. 5-23, 2005.
WANKEL, Charles (Ed.). Teaching arts and science with the new social media. Emerald Group Publishing, 2011.
WINOGRAD, Terry. Designing a new foundation for design. Communications of the ACM, v. 49, n. 5, p. 71-74, 2006.
ZINGER, Doron et al. A design-based research approach to improving professional development and teacher knowledge: The case of the Smithsonian learning lab. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, v. 17, n. 3, p. 388-410, 2017.
