Dentro de la dislexia: el conocimiento contextual y la metodología de una investigación guiada por la práctica a través del diseño tipográfico y la autoetnografía
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v8i1.699Palabras clave:
Autoetnografía, Dislexia, Diseño Gráfico, Dibujo iterativo, TipografíaResumen
Hay un mayor interés en la literatura reciente sobre el efecto de disfluencia en un esfuerzo por contextualizar los resultados de la investigación tipográfica que se basa en la legibilidad funcional. Recientemente, un pequeño grupo de investigadores tipográficos y de legibilidad han comenzado a pedir más colaboración para generar conocimiento que sea útil y práctico ( Thiessen, Beier & Keage, 2020). Este artículo presenta un proyecto de investigación de diseño dirigido por la práctica que utiliza dibujos iterativos y arreglos tipográficos a través de un enfoque autoetnográfico para transmitir la experiencia personal con la dislexia. El proyecto reflexiona sobre la pregunta: ¿Cómo se puede utilizar el dibujo iterativo y la composición tipográfica para expresar gráficamente la experiencia de aprendizaje disléxico subjetivo de una persona? Como pregunta secundaria y particularmente enfocada a la práctica, es cómo el proyecto puede contribuir a brindar conocimientos a una audiencia no disléxica de la comprensión de palabras y la disfluencia tipográfica que enfrentan las personas con condiciones disléxicas. La investigación está informada por una variedad de prácticas contextuales, profesionales y literatura, sobre los estados y condiciones de la experiencia disléxica, el uso de la adaptación tipográfica y la impresión Risograph. El proyecto se basa en un enfoque basado en la práctica, donde la práctica creativa y la investigación son complementarias pero distintivas. La investigación se basa en el mundo de interés definido por la práctica, mientras que el investigador practicante está en el centro de la investigación (Vear, 2022). Para suscitar una perspectiva disléxica, el proyecto emplea la autoetnografía como estrategia para recopilar e interpretar evidencia a través de un proceso crítico de ilustración y diseño tipográfico. La investigación contribuye a los discursos actuales en áreas como las relacionadas con los principios tipográficos de indicaciones visuales y énfasis, así como en otras áreas más amplias, como la forma en que podemos determinar el umbral para la falta de fluidez y el impacto que tienen las distracciones gráficas en el efecto de la falta de fluidez. .
Descargas
Citas
Ardern, S. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023) Awakening takes place within: a practice-led research through texture and embodiment. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Bjork, R., & Bjotk, E. (2020). Desirable Difficulties in Theory and Practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9, 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.003
Bolt, B. (2012). Heidegger reframed: Interpreting key thinkers for the arts. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bray, J. (2012). Concrete poetry and prose. In The Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature (pp. 314–325). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203116968-30
Brown, R. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Painting the Kitchen Tables: Exploring women's domestic creative spaces through publication design. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Chambers, J. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Second Nature, a Practice-led Design Investigation into Consumerism Responding to Sustainable Home Habits. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Chon, H., & Sim, J. (2019). From design thinking to design knowing: An educational perspective. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 18(2), 187-200.
Csordas, T. J. (1994). Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self (Vol. 2).
Delli Paoli, G. (n.d.). Word and Image. Behance. Retrieved May 26, 2022, from https://www.behance.net/gallery/2978721/Word-and-Image
Descartes, R. (1984). Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy fourth edition.
Draper, C. S. (1971). Guidance is Forever. NAVIGATION, 18(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.1971.tb00073.x
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1991). Towards a Phenomenology of Ethical Expertise. Human Studies, 14(4), 229–250.
Duncan, M. (2004). Autoethnography: Critical appreciation of an emerging art. International journal of qualitative methods, 3(4), 28-39.
Falconer, T. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Grounding: A Practice-led Graphic Exploration of Ecofeminism, Wellbeing and Ecological Consciousness. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Fox, N. J. (2008). Post-positivism. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 2, 659–664.
Hamilton, J., & Jaaniste, L. (2010). A connective model for the practice-led research exegesis: An analysis of content and structure. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 3, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp.3.1.31_1
Heidegger, M. (1962). I
Ho, A. G. (n.d.). Typography today: Emotion recognition in typography.
Thiessen, M., Beier, S., & Keage, H. (2020). A review of the cognitive effects of disfluent typography on functional reading. The Design Journal, 23(5), 797-815.I
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.
Ings, W. (2011). Managing Heuristics as a Method of Inquiry in Autobiographical Graphic Design Theses. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30, 226–241.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01699.x
Klein, G. (2018). Intuition or experience? Tacit knowledge in decision making. The Business & Management Collection.
Lewis, S. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Less than 5mm — The unseen threat: An investigation into how micro-plastics effect coral reefs. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Li, Q. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Memories from COVID-19: A practice-led research about the lockdown through the perspective of a Chinese student. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Lum, K. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Breakthrough: An illustrated autoethnographic narrative into professional identity and storytelling. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Nesteriuk, S., & Ings, W. (2018). New Thinking & Emerging Thoughts: Practice As Research In Design, Art And Technology. DAT Journal, 3(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v3i2.84
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Basic Writings. Psychology Press.
Michie, K., & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2021). From Shadow: a practice-led design research on academic anxiety. DAT Journal, 6(1), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v6i1.345
Mortensen Steagall, M. (2022). Immersive Photography: a review of the contextual knowledge of a PhD practice-led research project. Revista GEMInIS, 13(2), 73-80. doi:10.53450/2179-1465.rg.2022v13i2p73-80
Mortensen Steagall, M. (2021). Reflections on digital image and contemporaneity. Revista GEMInIS, 12(2), 241-250. doi:10.53450/2179-1465.RG.2021v12i2p241-250
Mortensen Steagall, M. (2020). Conceptual images in advertising: Premises of the advertising image powered by technology and interactivity. Convergencias: Revista de Investigacao e Ensino das Artes, XIII (26).
Mortensen Steagall, M., & Ings, W. (2018). Practice-led doctoral research and the nature of immersive methods / Pesquisa de doutorado practice-led e a natureza dos métodos imersivos. DAT Journal, 3(2), 392-423. doi:10.29147/dat.v3i2.98
Mortensen Steagall, M. (2019). The process of immersive photography: Beyond the cognitive and the physical (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995641
Mpofu, N., & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2021). Uhlola kweNdebele: Reconnecting Zimbabwe Through Typographic Design. TRANSVERSO, ANO 9, N. 10, AGOSTO 2021ISSN: 2236-4129, 9(10), 8-16.
Munro, A. J. (2011). Autoethnography as a research method in design research at universities. 20/20 Design Vision, 156.
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
Pallasmaa, J. (2017). Embodied and existential wisdom in architecture: The thinking hand. Body & Society, 23(1), 96-111.
Polanyi, M., & Sen, A. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago Press.
Pradel, P., Zhu, Z., Bibb, R., & Moultrie, J. (2018). A framework for mapping design for additive manufacturing knowledge for industrial and product design. Journal of Engineering Design, 29(6), 291–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1483011
Rosenberg, T. E. (2008). New beginnings and monstrous births: notes towards an appreciation of ideational drawing.
Ryan, A. B. (2006). Post-Positivist Approaches to Research. In M. Antonesa, H. Fallon, A. B. Ryan, A. Ryan, T. Walsh, & L. Borys (Eds.), Researching and Writing your Thesis: A guide for postgraduate students (pp. 12–26).
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner, How Professionals Think In Action. Routledge.
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Allen Lane.
Shan, K. & Mortensen Steagall, M. (2023). Forgotten: an autoethnographic exploration of belonging through Graphic Design. Design, Art and Technology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, forthcoming.
Snowling, M. J. (2019a). Does dyslexia exist? In M. J. Snowling (Ed.), Dyslexia: A Very Short Introduction (p. 0). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198818304.003.0001
Snowling, M. J. (2019b). What are the cognitive causes of dyslexia? In M. J. Snowling (Ed.), Dyslexia: A Very Short Introduction (p. 0). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198818304.003.0003
Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008). If It’s Hard to Read, It’s Hard to Do: Processing Fluency Affects Effort Prediction and Motivation. Psychological Science, 19(10), 986–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x
Strachey, E. (1888). Nonsense as a fine art. https://www.abebooks.com/first-edition/Edward-Lear-Nonsense-art-uncommon-original/31365715189/bd
Tantia, J. F. (2020). The Art and Science of Embodied Research Design: Concepts, Methods and Cases. Taylor & Francis Group.
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/aut/detail.action?docID=6378533
Thiessen, M., Beier, S., & Keage, H. (2020). A Review of the Cognitive Effects of Disfluent Typography on Functional Reading. The Design Journal, 23(5), 797–815.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1810434
van Kampen, S. (2019). An Investigation into Uncovering and Understanding Tacit Knowledge in a First-Year Design Studio Environment. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12171
Van Vliet, D., & Mortensen Steagall, M.. (2020). Duregraph: a study of duration in the post photographic image. DAT Journal, 5(3), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v5i3.234
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. T., & Rosch, E. (1992). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. New Edition.
Vaughan, L. (2017). Practice-based design research. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Vear, C. (2022). The Routledge International Handbook of Practice-Based Research. Routledge.
Vennatrø, R., & Høgseth, H. B. (2021). Craft as More-Than-Human: Practice-led research in a posthumanist perspective. FormAkademisk, 14(2), Article 2.
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4205
Yong, Z. F., Ng, A. L., & Nakayama, Y. (2019). The Dyslexperience: Use of Projection Mapping to Simulate Dyslexia*. 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 493–495. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340555.3358657
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 DAT Journal
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
