Metodología de la teoría fundamentada constructivista: una guía para explorar las epistemologías de la filosofía del diseño
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v10i3.1096Palabras clave:
Filosofía, Diseño, Epistemología, Lo Cotidiano, CGTResumen
En el contexto de la filosofía del diseño, esta investigación destaca los fundamentos del modernismo y su impacto en el diseño, así como el rol del diseñador en la vida cotidiana. Argumenta que el diseño no presta suficiente atención a sus fundamentos modernistas. A través de la perspectiva del cosmopolitismo y la cosmopolítica, la investigación explora lo cotidiano como marco para comprender el “mundo común”, donde el diseño media las interacciones entre humanos, no humanos y espacios sociales. Basándose en las ideas de Latour, Sloterdijk, Boltanski y Lefebvre, la investigación indaga en las relaciones dinámicas entre personas, objetos, política y producción espacial. Además, al interactuar con la filosofía del diseño de Parsons y Galle, propone que las experiencias cotidianas podrían reformular la epistemología del diseño, orientándola hacia enfoques más centrados en el ser humano. Basándose en la teoría fundamentada constructivista (TCC), el autor desarrolló un proceso metodológico de cinco etapas que apoyó la exploración de las filosofías del diseño y lo cotidiano como medio para avanzar hacia una epistemología adaptada del diseño.
Descargas
Citas
AUERNHAMMER, J.; FORD, C. Conference paper in the 13th Design Thinking Research Symposium on What is Design? The Semantic Core and Periphery of Design Definitions, March 22-24, Technicon – Israel Institute of Technology, 2022.
BERMAN, M. All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982.
BOLTANSKI, L.; CHIAPELLO, E. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Italy: Verso, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-006-9006-9
BOLTANSKI, L.; THÉVENOT, L. The Sociology of Critical Capacity, European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–77. In Silber, I. F. (2003). Pragmatic Sociology as Cultural Sociology: Beyond Repertoire Theory?, European Journal of Social Theory, 6 v4, p.427–449, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/136843199002003010
BRAY, D. Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: Representation and Leadership in Transnational Democracy. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230342965_8
BRIGHENTI, A. M. Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230282056
CHARMAZ, K. Constructing Grounded Theory. UK: Sage, 2014.
CROSS, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing. NY: Springer, 2006
DE CERTEAU, M. The Practice of Everyday Life. USA: University of California Press, 2011.
DORST, K. Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. USA: MIT Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10096.001.0001
ESCOBAR, A. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. USA: Duke University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816
FELL, E.; MIRENKOVA, I. V.; ORLOVSKAYA, T. V. Book Review: The Philosophy of Design. By Glenn Parsons, Advanced Access Publication 5th February 2016, p.174-176, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqw005
GALLE, P. Philosophy of Design; an introduction, Centre of Design Research, Denmark Designskole, p.1-6, 2007.
GALLE, P. Candidate worldviews for design theory. Design Studies, 29 v3, p.267-303, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.02.001
GALLE, P. Self-Knowledge by Proxy: Parsons on Philosophy of Design and the Modernist Vision, The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2 v4, p.322–342, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.05.001
GARRETT, J. J. The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web and Beyond. USA: New Riders, 2010.
GIOMBINI, L.; KVOKAČKA, A. Everydayness: Contemporary Aesthetic Approaches. Italy: RomaTrE-Press, 2021.
HARVEY, D. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
HIGHMORE, B. Everyday Life and Cultural Theory: An Introduction. UK: Routledge, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464229
JONES, D.; PLOWRIGHT, P.; BACHMAN, L.; POLDMA, T. Introduction: Design Epistemology. In. The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs, Design Research Society 2016, London, 1, p.295–302, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.619
JULIER, G. Consultant social design, austerity and citizenry. City, analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 2, v6, p.813-821, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1412203
KAUFMANN-BUHLER, J.; PASS, V.R.; WILSON, C.S. Design History Beyond the Canon. 1st ed. UK: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350051614.0006
KENDAL, G.; WOODWARD, I.; SKRBIS, Z. The Sociology of Cosmopolitanism: Globalization, Identity, Culture and Government. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234659
KRIPPENDORFF, K. The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. USA: CRC Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299951
LATOUR, B. On technical mediation, Common Knowledge, 3 v2, p.29-64, 1994.
LATOUR, B. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. USA: Harvard University Press, 2004a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039964
LATOUR, B. Whose Cosmos, Which Cosmopolitics? Comments on the Peace Terms of Ulrich Beck. Common Knowledge, 10 v3, p.450–462, 2004b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-10-3-450
LEFEBVRE, H. Critique of Everyday Life. USA: Verso, 1991a.
LEFEBVRE, H. The Production of Space. UK: Blackwell, 1991b.
LIDWELL, W.; HOLDEN, K.; BUTLER, J. Universal Principles of Design. USA: Rockport Publishers, 2010.
LIGITA, T.; HARVEY, N.; WICKING, K.; NURJANNAH, I.; FRANCIS, K. A practical example of using theoretical sampling throughout a grounded theory study: A methodological paper, Qualitative Research Journal, 20 v1, p.116-126, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-07-2019-0059
LINDQVIST, H.; FORSBERG, C. Constructivist grounded theory and educational research: constructing theories about teachers’ work when analysing relationships between codes, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 46 v2, p.200-2010, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2095998
MARGOLIN, V. The Politics of the Artificial. USA: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
MASSEY, D. Space, Place and Gender. USA: Polity, 2013.
MILLS, J.; BONNER, A.; FRANCIS, K. The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 v1, p.25-35, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500103
NELSON, H. G.; STOLTERMAN, E. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.): USA. MIT Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9188.001.0001
NIEUWENHUIS, M. Taking Up The Challenge Of Space: New Conceptualisations Of Space In The Work Of Peter Sloterdijk And Graham Harman. Continent, 4 v1, p.16-37, 2014.
NORMAN, D.A. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books, 2013.
PARSONS, G. The Philosophy of Design. USA: Polity Press, 2016.
POHL, C.; HADORN, G.H. Gestaltungsprinzipien für die Transdisziplinäre Forschung – ein Beitrag destd-net, München: oekom. In: Hadorn, G.H, Hoffmann-Riem, H, Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W, Joye, D, Pohl, C, Wiesmann, U, & Zemp, E. 2008. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. S.I.: Springer, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3
POLDMA, T. The Dynamics of Theory and Practice in Design Learning: Contexts, Service and a Discipline in Evolution, The Journal of Interior Architecture Special Issue - Teooriast praktikani/Dynamics of Theory and Practice, 1, p.92-109, 2015.
RAIZMAN, D. History of Modern Design: Graphics and Products Since the Industrial Revolution. UK: Laurence King Publishing, 2003.
SAUCE, B.; MATZEL, L. D. Inductive Reasoning, Encyclopaedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior, S.I., p.1-8, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1045-1
SAUNDERS, M.; LEWIS, P.; THORNHILL, A. Research Methods for Business Students, (3rd ed). USA: Pearson Education Limited, 2003.
SCHINKEL, W.; NOORDEGRAAF-EELENS, L. In Media Res: Peter Sloterdijk’s Spherological Poetics of Being. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089643292
SCHÖN, D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. USA: Ashgate Publishing, 1983.
SLOTERDIJK, P. Critique of Cynical Reasoning. USA: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
SLOTERDIJK, P. Spheres volume I: Bubbles: Microspherology. Germany: Semiotext(e), 2011.
SMIT, B. Atlas.ti. for qualitative data analysis, Perspectives Education, 20 v3, p.65-76, 2002.
STENGERS, I. Cosmopolitics I. USA: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
STENGERS, I. Cosmopolitics II. USA: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.
UGLANOVA, I.; GIUS, E. The Order of Things: A Study on Topic Modelling of Literary Text. Workshop on Computational Humanities Research, 1(2723), p.57-76, 2020.
WILSON, J. Essentials of Business Research: A Guide to Doing Your Research Project. UK: SAGE Publications, 2010.
YIN, R. K. Qualitative Research From Start to Finish. UK: The Guilford Press, 2011.
ZELECHOWSKA, D.; ZYLUK, N.; URBAŃSKI, M. Find Out A New Method to Study Abductive Reasoning in Empirical Research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, p.1-11, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920909674
ZHANG, Z. What Is Lived Space?, Ephemera: theory & politics in organization, 6 v2, p.219–223, 2006.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 DAT Journal
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
