Monoculture, Monotechnic, Mononature – conflicts of technobiodiverse existences in hegemonic systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v8i3.766Keywords:
Cosmotechnics, Art-Technology, Interactive Installation, Philosophy Of TechnologyAbstract
Thinking of different forms of existence in the digital is an exercise of articulating the technobiodiverse agents of their environment. We propose an ecological thinking that encompasses technology through poetic creation. Thus, we discuss the interactive installation “monoculture, monotenic, mononature” in the context of an ontological investigation of technology, reviewing the Modern ruptures between culture, technique and nature. We start with an investigation with the Eucalyptus, the most planted tree in Brazil, but of Australian origin. While in its native territory it is responsible for maintaining much of the local biodiversity and is seen as sacred by the aboriginal populations, in Brazil it was introduced in a monoculture system that interferes with biodiversity and generates conflict in territories with local populations. Therefore, we propose a reflection with distinct elements of the artwork, from the concept of cosmotechnics, to highlight the conflicts of multiple and technobiodiverse existences in the current hegemonic technological systems, pointing out how the construction of a poetics of care can indicate new paths for technological thinking.
Downloads
References
AMPT, H. The Ideal Australian: The role of the gum tree in an Australian collective cultural identity. Thesis—[s.l.] University of Otago, 2020.
ARANTES, P.; PRADO, G. Expanded Circuits and Poetic re-writings: Circuito Alameda. (J. Park, J. Nam, J. Wan Park, Eds.)25th International Symposium on Electronic Art. Anais... Gwangju: 2019.
AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS AND SCIENCES (ABARES).
Australian forest profiles 2019: Eucalypt. 2019.
BARRALAGA, F. Sensores Ultrasónicos y Arduino en Experiencias de Laboratorio de Cinemá- tica. Revista de la Escuela de Física, v. 9, n. 1, p. 65–72, 9 jun. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5377/ref.v9i1.12301
CALVIÑO-CANCELA, M. Effectiveness of eucalypt plantations as a surrogate habitat for birds.
Forest Ecology and Management, v. 310, p. 692–699, dez. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.014
CARVALHO, A.; RIQUITO, M. Linhas de fuga do Antropoceno: ontologias não-modernas e os antípodas da Razão*. e-cadernos CES, n. 38, 15 dez. 2022.
Cruzando o deserto verde. Direção: Sá. Brasil: Movimento Alerta, 2002. Disponível em:
tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3yeep1BNRw>. Acesso em: 26 maio. 2023 DELEUZE, G. Bergsonismo. Tradução: Luiz B. L. Orlandi. São Paulo: Editora 34, 1999. DELEUZE, G. Diferença e Repetição. São Paulo: Paz & Terra, 2018.
Desertos Verdes: plantações de eucalipto, agrotóxicos e água. Direção: Lopes, Gonçal- ves. Brasil: CEPEDES, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YXuOaC- 3Po0>. Acesso em: 26 maio. 2023
Do pó da terra: a arte de gente feita de barro. Direção: Nahas. Brasil: Notorius Films, 2016.
DOUGHTY, R. Not a Koala in Sight: Promotion and Spread of Eucalyptus. Ecumene, v. 3, n. 2, p. 200–214, abr. 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409600300205
ESCOBAR, A. Postconstructivist Political Ecologies. Em: REDCLIFT, M. R.; WOODGATE, G. (Eds.). The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Second Edition. [s.l.] Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805520.00015
ESCOBAR, A. Thinking-feeling with the Earth: Territorial Struggles and the Ontological Di- mension of the Epistemologies of the South. AIBR, Revista de Antropología Iberoameri- cana, v. 11, n. 1, p. 11–32, 1 jan. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102e
Eucalypt. Direção: McComark. Austrália: Remember the Wild, 2020.
FERDINAND, M. Uma ecologia decolonial: pensar a partir do mundo caribenho. São Pau- lo: Ubu, 2022.
FOELKEL, C. E. B. Eucalipto no Brasil, História de Pionerismo. Visão Agrícola, Florestas Plan-
tadas. v. 4, n. ESALQ-USP, p. 66–69, dez. 2005.
FONSECA, S. R. D. Monocultivo de Eucalipto, relações de trabalho e os caminhos da re- sistência camponesa no assentamento São Joaquim (MS). Dissertação de Mestrado em Geografia—[s.l.] Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, 2014.
GALANTER, P. Generative Art Theory. Em: PAUL, C. (Ed.). A Companion to Digital Art. Ho- boken: John Wiley & Sons, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475249.ch5
Gerais. Direção: Frazão e Carvalho, Brasil: Curta Agroecologia, 2015.
GESTEIRA, S. G. Art and Land: Eucalyptus Plantations in Brazilian Documentaries. Humani- ties, v. 11, n. 2, p. 53, 7 abr. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/h11020053
HARAWAY, D. et al. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos, v. 81, n. 3, p. 535–564, 26 maio 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838
HARAWAY, D. J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and
London: Duke University Press, 2016.
HUI, Y. The Question Concerning Technology in China: An Essay in Cosmotechnics. Fal-
mouth: Urbanomic, 2018.
HUI, Y. Tecnodiversidade. São Paulo: Ubu Editora, 2020.
INGOLD, T. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill.
New edition ed. London: Routledge, 2021.
KLEIN, N. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014.
KRÖGER, M.; HAGOLANI-ALBOV, S. E.; GILLS, B. K. Extractivisms. Em: KRIEG, C. P.; TOIVA-
NEN, R. (Eds.). Situating Sustainability: A Handbook of Contexts and Concepts. [s.l.] Hel- sinki University Press, 2021. p. 239–252.
LATOUR, B. Reagregando o social: uma introdução à teoria-ator-rede. Salvador, Bauru: EDUFBA, EDUSC, 2012.
LATOUR, B. Investigação sobre os modos de existência: Uma antropologia dos moder- nos. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2019.
LONG, A. Aboriginal scarredtrees in New South Wales. Hurstville, Australia: Australian Department of Environment and Conservation, 2005.
MONTANARI, M. DA R.; PRADO, G. Techno-bio-diversities in Latin American Art: Circuito Alameda and Proyecto Bíos. 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (ARTECH 2021). Anais...New York City: Association for Computing Machinery, out. 2021. Dis- ponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1145/3483529.3483699>
MONTANARI, M. DA R.; PRADO, G. From vigilance to vigil: an introduction to an alternative paradigm for technology, art, and life. Diffractions, v. 1, n. 5, p. 71–98, 2022.
MOORE, J. Anthropocene Or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capita- lism. Oakland: Kairos, 2016.
NEBEL, S. et al. A Review of Photogrammetry and Photorealistic 3D Models in Education From a Psychological Perspective. Frontiers in Education, v. 5, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00144
NEUENFELDT, K. (ED.). The didjeridu: from Arnhem Land to Internet. Sydney: J. Libbey/ Perfect Beat Publications, 1997.
NITAHARA, A. IBGE: Brasil tem 9,85 milhões de hectares de florestas plantadas. Disponível em: <https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/geral/noticia/2018-09/ibge-brasil-tem-985-mi-lhoes-de-hectares-de-florestas-plantadas>. Acesso em: 25 maio. 2023.
NOGALES, N. Amazonía y expansión mercantil capitalista: nueva frontera de recursos en el siglo XXI. [s.l.] Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales. CLACSO, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2v88d7q
PACHECO, T.; PORTO, M. F.; ROCHA, D. Metodologia e Resultados do Mapa: uma síntese dos casos de injustiça ambiental e saúde no Brasil. Em: PORTO, M. F.; PACHECO, T.; LEROY, J. P. (Eds.). Injustiça Ambiental e Saúde no Brasil. [s.l.] Editora Fiocruz, 2013.
PINTO JÚNIOR, J. E.; SILVEIRA, R. A. A introdução do eucalipto no Brasil pela Embrapa: bases institucionais e sua estruturação para a pesquisa com eucaliptos e corímbias. Em: OLIVEIRA, EDILSON BATISTA DE; PINTO JÚNIOR, JOSÉ EDINEY (Eds.). O eucalipto e a Embrapa: quatro décadas de pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Brasilia: EMBRAPA, 2021.
PRADO, G. Circuito Alameda. Em: Circuito Alameda. Cidade do México: Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes, Laboratorio Arte Alameda, 2018. p. 28–37.
PROENÇA, V. M. et al. Plant and bird diversity in natural forests and in native and exotic plantations in NW Portugal. Acta Oecologica, v. 36, n. 2, p. 219–226, mar. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2010.01.002
REED, D. H. Relationship between Population Size and Fitness. Conservation Biology, v. 19, n. 2, p. 563–568, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00444.x
RODRÍGUEZ-SUÁREZ, J. A. et al. Influence of Eucalyptus globulus plantation growth on wa- ter table levels and low flows in a small catchment. Journal of Hydrology, v. 396, n. 3–4, p. 321–326, jan. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.027
SIMONDON, G. Do Modo De Existência Dos Objetos Técnicos. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto,
VALDUGA, M. O.; ZENNI, R. D.; VITULE, J. R. S. Ecological impacts of non-native tree species plantations are broad and heterogeneous: a review of Brazilian research. Anais da Acade- mia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 88, n. 3 suppl, p. 1675–1688, 10 out. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150575
WILLI, Y.; VAN BUSKIRK, J.; HOFFMANN, A. A. Limits to the Adaptive Potential of Small Po- pulations. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, v. 37, n. 1, p. 433–458, 1 dez. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110145
ZANUNCIO, J. C. et al. Influence of strips of native vegetation on Lepidoptera associated with Eucalyptus cloeziana in Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 108, n. 1–2, p. 85–90, ago. 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00215-1
ZHANG, Y.; WANG, X. Geographical spatial distribution and productivity dynamic change of eucalyptus plantations in China. Scientific Reports, v. 11, n. 1, p. 19764, 5 out. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97089-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 DAT Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.