Mass customization and dynamic reconfiguration of incomplete products
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29147/dat.v4i1.111Keywords:
Mass customization, Product design, Incomplete productsAbstract
This paper presents, from the point of view of Information Design, a comparative analysis from the graphic representation of a research project through the mapping of information by Robert Horn (1993) and the graphic tools of Yvonne Hansen (1999). The objective of this paper is to compare the representation of a research project from the study of the tools proposed by these authors. The methodology adopted is based on bibliographical research as the main technical procedure and from this practice it is proposed to analyze comparatively the two tools. As results, it was noted that Horn’s information mapping is not efficient in the initial phase of problem study but it is useful when it is necessary to organize information; and that Hansen’s graphic tools can be used in the initial process of specifying a problem because they are efficient in clarifying ideas and understanding concepts.
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, C. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business, 2012.
CARPO, M. The Alphabet and the Algorithm. MIT Press, 2011.
DAVIES, P.; NG, I. Moving towards the Incomplete: A Research Agenda for the Development of Future Products in the Digital Economy. Procedia Manufacturing, 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015. v. 3, p. 3368–3374, 2015.
DAVIS, S. M. Future Perfect. Boston: Addisonc Wesley, 1987.
ELLENA, T. et al. The Helmet Fit Index: An intelligent tool for fit assessment and design customisation. Applied Ergonomics, v. 55, p. 194–207, 2016.
FERGUSON, S. M.; OLEWNIK, A. T.; CORMIER, P. A review of mass customization across marketing, engineering and distribution domains toward development of a process framework. Research in Engineering Design, v. 25, n. 1, p.11–30, 2014.
NG, I. et al. Contextual variety, Internet-of-Things and the choice of tailoring over platform: Mass customisation strategy in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 159, p. 76–87, 2015.
PILLER, F. T. Mass Customization: Reflections on the State of the Concept. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, v. 16, n. 4, p. 313–334, 2004.
RAFFLE, H. S.; PARKES, A. J.; ISHII, H. Topobo: A Constructive Assembly System with Kinetic Memory. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Anais...: CHI ’04.New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2004Disponível em: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985774. Acesso em: 1 set. 2016
VARGO, S. L.; LUSCH, R. F. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, v. 68, n. 1, p. 1–17, jan. 2004.
YANG, B.; BURNS, N. Implications of postponement for the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, v. 41, n. 9, 2003.
ZIPKIN, P. The Limits of Mass Customization. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 42, n. 3, p.81–87, 1997.
